Feedback that sounds like you wrote it

Personalised, rubric-aligned written feedback for every student submission, in your tone, at your standard. You review, adjust, and share. The thinking is done.

Feedback that actually teaches

Eduface reads submissions, flags specific passages, and drafts criterion specific comments every word reviewed by you before students see anything.

Student submission
Feedback

Lecturer + AI

Good choice of theme for the introduction; a next step would be to explicitly link it to the corresponding learning objectives for added clarity.

Lecturer + AI

Good choice of theme for the introduction; a next step would be to explicitly link it to the corresponding learning objectives for added clarity.

Share with student

Choose the tone of feedback

Reflective & Socratic, Constructive & Direct, What Went Well & Needs Improvement, Supportive & Encouraging. Each style configurable per assignment, consistent at scale.

?

Reflective & Socratic

Nudges deeper thinking

Constructive & Direct

Clear, actionable steps

±

What Went Well & Needs Improvement

Structured dual format

Supportive & Encouraging

Motivates progression

Write meaningful feedback in less time

Writing meaningful feedback for 80 students takes the better part of a day. Eduface handles the first pass so you spend your time on the judgment calls only you can make.

Without Eduface

30

min / student

With Eduface

5

min / student

83% less time spent on first-pass feedback

Based on teacher-reported times across active pilots

80 students means 80 pieces of written feedback

Each one takes 20–45 minutes to write well. That's days of work per assignment cycle.

Generic feedback doesn't help students improve

Students don't know what they specifically need to do differently.

Feedback that arrives late is feedback wasted

Students have moved on. The moment to act on it has passed.

80 students means 80 pieces of written feedback

Each one takes 20–45 minutes to write well. That's days of work per assignment cycle.

Generic feedback doesn't help students improve

Students don't know what they specifically need to do differently.

Feedback that arrives late is feedback wasted

Students have moved on. The moment to act on it has passed.

Track skill progression across every draft

Eduface tracks up to 18 skills per student across every draft, so you can see exactly where progress happened and where they still need support.

Critical argumentation

Draft 1 →

81

/100

+39

pts

D1

D2

D3

D4

Final

Use of evidence

Draft 1 →

79

/100

+41

pts

D1

D2

D3

D4

Final

Structure & clarity

Draft 1 →

85

/100

+30

pts

D1

D2

D3

D4

Final

Engagement with sources

Draft 1 →

77

/100

+47

pts

D1

D2

D3

D4

Final

+29pts

Average score improvement

across all tracked skills

12–18

Skills tracked per student

tailored to course

Up to ∞

Feedback loops per assignment

no cap on draft submissions

Track skill progression across every draft

Eduface tracks up to 18 skills per student across every draft, so you can see exactly where progress happened and where they still need support.

Critical argumentation

Draft 1 →

81

/100

D1

D2

D3

D4

Final

Use of evidence

Draft 1 →

79

/100

D1

D2

D3

D4

Final

Structure & clarity

Draft 1 →

85

/100

D1

D2

D3

D4

Final

Engagement sources

Draft 1 →

77

/100

D1

D2

D3

D4

Final

See what your feedback could look like

Book a 30-minute demo. We'll show you a live walkthrough with a rubric from your own faculty if you share it in advance.

See what your feedback could look like

Book a 30-minute demo. We'll show you a live walkthrough with a rubric from your own faculty if you share it in advance.